Thursday, July 28, 2011

Democrat Republican BOE Member Dan Nichols Rejected By Party; ‘Intends’ To Primary

First reported by Nanci Hutson in today’s News-Times, Republican BOE Vice-Chair Dan Nichols “intends” to primary his way to the November election after being rejected by the Republican Caucus.   It won’t be an easy task to get signatures from 5% of the 4,845 registered Republicans in Town.

There is a mistake in Nanci’s story that must be corrected.   Evidently, someone she  trusts to be a reliable source must have lied to her.  She wrote, “The Republican Town Committee nominated five candidates, and added Nichols' name only after prodding during the caucus.”  Not true.

The Nominating Committee nominated six candidates – not five as reported -- including Nichols.  The RTC brought all six nominations to the caucus.  There was no “prodding.” 

In addition, Nichols’ name was first on the list of the six names from which five were to be chosen for the available positions. The vote to reject him was made by all registered Republicans who attended the caucus.   Obviously they decided to “slap him in the face” – his words --because they disagree with the choices he makes as BOE Vice-Chair.

And, Folks, that’s politics at the most basic level; if you disagree with the positions taken by an elected official, “vote da’ bum out!”

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Sega Meadows Bike Trail Opens Today

With a number of bicyclists ready at their pedals and handlebars, the Mayor officially launched the Sega Meadows Bike Trail today.  From left to right, Resident Tom O'Brien, Mayor Pat Murphy, Director of Public Works Mike Zarba and Parks and Rec Director Dan Calhoun.

From left to right, Tammy Reardon, Mayor Pat Murphy, Dan Calhoun, Eleanor Covelli, Mike Zarba, Tom O'Brein and son.
From left to right, Tom O'Brien, Mayor Pat Murphy, Mike Zarba, Dan Calhoun

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Closing of Danbury DMV An Abomination

The decision to close the Danbury DMV office is an absolute insult to Connecticut taxpayers.  A worse way to impact our day-to-day lives could not have been found.

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Chief Justice Rogers: Budget Cuts May Compromise the System

In a legal system that is already burdened with problems, this statement from Connecticut's Chief Justice makes me both sad and angry.

July 15, 2011

"Statement of the Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers Regarding budgetary reductions to the Judicial Branch.

Our state Constitution in Article I, Section 10 states: “All courts shall be open, and every person, for an injury done to him in his person, property or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale, denial or delay.”

The Connecticut Judicial Branch has always met this responsibility, but as we face unprecedented budget cuts, I fear that our courts will be unable to fulfill the mandate that the Constitution requires and that every resident deserves. Because we have no option but to close and consolidate courts and to lay off 452 employees, these cuts will dramatically change the way the Judicial Branch does business.

We don’t have the option of turning away any cases, so we must do our best to adjudicate the over 550,000 cases that come to our courts every year, with significantly reduced funding. Clearly, it is necessary to prioritize, and I can assure you that criminal cases will be our top priority. But this means that our limited resources must be stretched to also assist parties in family and civil matters, including many who are self-represented. Unfortunately, with the emphasis on criminal matters, this task will grow more difficult as there will be fewer clerks, interpreters, court monitors, family relations counselors, mediators, law libraries and other resources available.

As Chief Justice, I am responsible for the administration of the Judicial Branch. My message has been consistent that we must do more with less and look for innovative ways to best serve the public with reduced resources. With these cuts, however, I am not certain that we can adequately meet the requirements of Article I, Section 10. Access will be limited and we also anticipate that the resolution of civil, family, housing and small claims cases will be delayed. The end result is that our ability to administer justice as required by the Constitution may very well be compromised."